|
A standard of care is not established by what is actually done.
The standard of care requires that a health care professional exercise
that level of care, skill, and treatment which, in light of all
relevant surrounding circumstances, is recognized as acceptable
and appropriate by reasonably prudent similar healthcare providers.
The standard may or may not be met by a particular practice. A particular
practice may be a factor in establishing the standard of care.
Therefore, simply because a defibrillator is used does not establish
its use as the standard of care and does not necessarily require
that a defibrillator be used in the other location. Your inquiry
should be whether a reasonably prudent similar healthcare provider
would install a defibrillator in the other location.
It is prudent risk management practice to obtain outside consultation
from an expert in the field. You could ask an outside expert in
emergency care and in-house experts their opinions on whether a
defibrillator should be installed in the other location.
Among the factors you could consider are the following: the distance
between the two center locations, differences in characteristics
of the patients served, the likelihood that a defibrillator will
be needed, the distance to the nearest medical facility which provides
appropriate cardiac care, ambulance response times, whether staff
competent to operate the defibrillator will be available, whether
staff will have sufficient time to practice use of the defibrillator
and your ability to provide ongoing defibrillator training.
There is an increased risk of liability only when you violate the
standard of care. The standard of care for use of the defibrillator
would require that you use it in a way that is acceptable and appropriate
by reasonably prudent similar healthcare providers. Thus, you could
be expected to place a defibrillator where appropriate, to provide
appropriate training for your staff and to monitor your staff to
be sure that they are following guidelines taught in training.
|